This year’s cake is actually vegan and gluten free. You can hardly taste the difference!
Holy moly, that’s like half a decade!
As I look back over the (now quite long) path of this endeavor I’m struck by how thoroughly CoachAccountable has moved past the “startup” phase, how far beyond that humble “Yeah, I’m going to make a web app to help coaches and see if it takes!” hopeful state.
CoachAccountable has taken.
I got a note the other week with an interesting ask from Adil of Adil Iman Coaching:
Evening John,
Hope all is well. I love the software and I will be sure to sign up after the trial. I am shooting a video next week about what happens in a coaching session and there after.
Are you okay for me to mention this software and if so what could I say in a nutshell to sell the idea.
Any suggestions or scripts would be fantastic.
Thank you for creating a great software.
Regards,
Adil
» Continue reading “Helping Your Clients Understand How You’re Going to Use Coaching Software”
Comments off
You know I can probably fit like 2 or 3 more on there. Re-gifting might be a sin, but re-caking? Totally fine.
Oh jeez, someone ordered the wrong sash for Mr. CoachAccountable, it was supposed to say “Happy Birthday”. Oddly he doesn’t seem to mind.
CoachAccountable’s fourth year of existence since the 2.0 release got off to a groovy start with the release of CA Mobile, the appy experience of CoachAccountable for coaches and clients but without the hassle of having to find and download anything from an app store.
Then in January CoachAccountable got a named shout out in the Acknowledgements section at the end of the New York Times best seller book Always Hungry, for which CoachAccountable served as the platform for the pilot program upon which the book is based.
Tambre Leighn and company chose CoachAccountable as the delivery and community platform for their cancer survivors program, Well Beyond This. That CA Groups serve as a support group medium for participants makes this a project for which I am deeply honored to be a part of.
Along the way there has been the usual bevvy of enhancements and expansions to the system, including Course Whiteboards, Unit-Based Courses, Worksheet Image Prompts, and Form-Based Session Notes.
Beyond that it’s been busy times as the platform continues to grow and evolve to serve ever larger organizations and programs, so much so that my days as a one-man shop have come to an end. The need for assistance to keep up has prompted me to create the new Director of Customer Support and Hand Holding position. I’ll be introducing him in this space very soon.
Year 5 promises to be the biggest leap forward for CoachAccountable yet. As usual I have much more up my sleeve to better the platform in order to better forward and serve the industry and the many talented coaches working to produce great results.
My many heartfelt thanks to coaches and organizations who continue to try out CA and find it a win for their work, here’s to another year of great coaching!
Yes, the title of this post is crude and vulgar.
But we all know it when we experience it. It can be maddening enough that any gentler term would be whitewashing of how it leaves us.
The other day I got an email invoice for my annual service with a company that, to protect the guilty, shall not be called out specifically. It was for about twice the amount I paid for the previous years of which I’ve been a customer, and invoice contained these friendly words:
Thank you for your purchase! Please contact billing@____.com with questions or concerns.
A common concern with using a web-based system like CoachAccountable is one of privacy: the information that is captured and stored over the course of a coaching relationship is of course of a highly personal and often sensitive nature. To use a system like CoachAccountable, wherein that information is stored and managed with a third party, requires confidence that such private matters will stay private.
This is a worthy and well-founded concern, and the expectation of confidentially is most reasonable and in fact should be present.
To address that concern I’d like to first contrast CoachAccountable against web-based companies like Google and Facebook, whose business model is to give away the platform for free and monetize customer relationships by owning and selling the customer data. CoachAccountable on the other hand is a platform which charges for use of the product itself, and does not traffic in the sale or sharing of data in any way whatsoever.
Comments off
Most of the legalese-filled documents like “Terms of Service” and “Privacy Policy” are lengthy, uninteresting, and full of jargon that is generally inaccessible to humans. CoachAccountable has such documents and they indeed fit that model: they are fully vetted as legit and covering all bases by qualified lawyers, but that still doesn’t mean they’re not boring, boilerplate, and overall uninteresting.
Perhaps that is as it is meant to be to satisfy the needs and eventualities that can arise in our current system of law. Fine, so be it.
But when it comes to outlining the parameters of the relationship between CoachAccountable and its customers, there really is (and deserves to be) more to the story. Enter the CoachAccountable Terms of Awesome.
Written like a manifesto of the rights and privileges one can expect as a user of CoachAccountable, the Terms of Awesome is essentially an account of how I’ve been doing business with folks since launching back in 2012. It’s been working well, so I’m happy to declare publicly that that is, in fact, the deal. Read the Terms of Awesome here.
Baby Kira, sporting promotional gear.
In fairness I drew this on a plain white onesie a few weeks before she was born.
Turns out demand for CA merch for newborns is really low. :)
Amid a tendency in business for smaller operations to portray themselves as larger ones to appear more successful or be taken more seriously, I submit to the world a proudly defiant confession:
CoachAccountable is indeed a one-man operation.
I’m delighted by how often that surprises people when they learn this, from long time customers to first time visitors to the site.
This setup works remarkably well. Having marketing, customer support, UI design, copy writing, and actual building of the system all come from the same brain affords delightful efficiency. Just the other week when creating a tutorial video I found places wherein it would be more logical to teach and more pretty to present with a few modifications. So I just made those modifications to the software, and continued on with my screen captures (in a larger organization the marketer would usually have to propose those changes to the product manager, and if the marketer was lucky enough to have those changes accepted and prioritized, the product manager would have to schedule in those changes to with the development team, and then those changes would be made and released days if not weeks or months later).
But that I am just one person causes concern for some people, and understandably so. One coach who was at the time a prospective customer summed it up beautifully:
…It concerns me a little that you are a one man shop. Though obviously a very gifted, committed, and responsive one man (in fact I don’t like people like you who can make me – a mere mortal – feel like a sluff…haha) but there is inherent exposure for all of us there. How will you keep up with supporting the system as it grows? What happens if you (heaven forbid) were to get hit by the proverbial beer truck? For those of us who could be staking our coaching livelihoods on a system like this, it leaves one concerned about the exposure and need for a continuity plan.
Very fair questions indeed.
Yesterday I had a fun chat come in to me from the website. A fellow from Poland started it off by writing:
I just found your web software
are you really founder of this?
To which I replied “I am indeed.”
wow
can I be frankly?
To which I replied “Please do.”
sound like: hmm is they have so SMALL about of business, that founder can spend time to chat ??
because for example I am founder of my own company and its hard to talk with me – only via coaching session :)
To that I chuckled. That’s a fair assessment, and since I have no hang up about CoachAccountable being a tidy, one-man operation realized then and there just how comfortable I am with projecting that appearance. I replied the truth, the last line of which was an insight which came to me on the spot:
Yep. For the time being I’m going to enjoy for as long as I can the luxury of being able to talk directly with the community I’m serving.
It makes a huge difference for me to be able to do so,
you might think of it as the best sort of market research one could possibly do.
That about says it all. Being available to chat keeps causing great conversations. These conversations bring super useful insights to me and helpful answers to people who chat me (to say nothing of the sense of connection to this being a real thing made by a real guy and not just some faceless company).
So THAT’s why, yes, you can still chat with the founder of CoachAccountable.
I’m gonna ride this train for as long as I can.
No, seriously.
After explaining in detail the reasoning behind why I charge $50/month for white-labeling, I was delighted to receive a comment containing most thorough dissent from Michael Leahy, one of the newer customers of CoachAccountable, and one of my favorite for his high level of engagement and input.
I believe it’s the first real criticism ever to be expressed in the comments of this humble blog, and while the always-positive environment of the community’s feedback is a delightful boon to my morale, it does pose within it the chance of this devolving into a sort of rosy echo chamber. By contrast, Michael’s strong opposition brings forth the chance for a lively exchange and exploration of ideas (if you haven’t read it yet, go check it out first before continuing), and affords me the chance to get off my laurels and work through a thoughtful response.
This is good stuff, so I’ve opted to move this more center stage into a post of its own rather than have it languish in the comments section.
Comments off